Reverse Your Point of View
While poking around on the net, I discovered an ad produced by Leo Burnett Italia. It runs forty seconds: check it out.
This is a powerful ad. And I hope its message is heeded by those at whom it is directed.
But it reminded me of what a wonderful mind-opening technique looking at things in a reverse manner can be.
Here is one of my favorite examples of "reverse." I'll quote a section from my book, A Whack on the Side of the Head**, called "Reverse Living":
Life is tough. It takes up all your time, all your weekends, and what do you get at the end of it? Death, a great reward. The life cycle is all backwards. You should die first, and get it out of the way. Then you live for twenty years in an old age home, and then get kicked out when you’re too young. You get a gold watch and then you go to work. You work forty years until you’re young enough to enjoy your retirement.
You go to college and party until you’re ready for high school. Then you go to grade school, you become a little kid, you play, you have no responsibilities, you become a little baby, you go back into the womb, you spend your last nine months floating, and you finish off as a gleam in somebody’s eye.
What can you look at backwards? How might you see it in a fresh way?
**The 25th Anniversary Edition (completely revised and updated) of the book "A Whack on the Side of the Head: How You Can Be More Creative" will be published by Business Plus on May 5, 2008. It is starting to appear in stores this week, and is currently shipping from Amazon. The retail price is $16.99 ($11.55 at Amazon).
Hi Roger!
That clip is awesome! Elegantly executed.
What can I look at backwards? I go through most of my day looking at the end of whatever I'm doing...calls, editing, prepping a film, etc...and seeing the outcome of that event.
Then...playing it backwards to see what has to get done to achieve that end.
Been doing it so long I never really thought too much about it until I read your post here.
Ah...how much we take for granted, ey?
:-)
Posted by: Thomas Clifford | 15 April 2008 at 06:32 PM
Roger. I'm looking forward to the Updated
Whack. Will the "cards" also be updated?
However, I do have an observation. Isn't your example of "reverse living" from the book actually taken from one of George Carlin's bits? Instead of finishing off with a "gleam," Carlin says we finish off as an "orgasm." ( I think it's also printed in
one of his books.)
You don't give Carlin credit in the blurb
on the blog. Hope you do in the book.
The Burnett spot is tremendous. We all ought to think in "reverse" when we try
to define problems. And then, "rearrange."
Thanks for the inspirations and insights
over the years.
Posted by: JIM CLARK | 16 April 2008 at 11:24 AM
Thomas: Thanks for the tip . . . and also for stopping by.
Jim: I had fun re-doing the Whack book. I re-did the Creative Whack Pack cards in 2003, and that's the edition currently being sold.
About "Reverse Living": I never knew who the author was. A seminar participant in the early 1980s gave me a written version of it that had no name on it. I searched around for the source but always came up empty. Since then, I've usually attributed it to an unknown comedian. But it does sound like Carlin, doesn't it. However, the new "Whack" already been printed, so maybe in future editions. Good luck to you!
Posted by: Roger von Oech | 16 April 2008 at 01:11 PM
What about looking at things inside out?
There are many positive aspects to that as well.
Just a thought...
Best,
Chelsey
P.S. That clip is very thought provoking, than you for posting it! I have seen it before and it is not something easily forgotten.
Posted by: Chelsey | 16 April 2008 at 09:46 PM
I loved the original "Whack on the Side of the Head". I think I loaned it to someone who never returned it as it has vanished from my bookshelf. I hope they are enjoying it, or loaning it out, too. So now I have a perfect excuse for buying the new version!
Posted by: terry grant | 19 April 2008 at 09:35 AM
Roger,
If the biological processes ran backwards, fewer would live to young age because the frailties of old age make us vulnerable to the natural shocks that flesh is heir to. That would be something like the high rates of infant and child mortality before industry made soap, safe water, and safe food widely available.
Also, for those who survived old age, the injuries from the frailties of age would likely last into our youth. Making our young years more often lived with disability.
Well, that's one way of looking at it.
John
Posted by: Shakespeare's Fool | 06 May 2008 at 06:41 PM