On July 24, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted me US Patent 7,247,075 for my design of the "right regular golden rhombic pyramid" which is the basic building block of the Ball of Whacks. You can read about it HERE in the USPTO's Full-Text Database.
As you can see, I'm very excited. I have other intellectual property including registered trademarks and copyrights, but this was my first patent.
I submitted my patent application to the USPTO on November 15, 2004. Thus, the whole process took over 32 months.
I wrote my own fifteen page patent application. Why did I do it myself and not turn it over to a patent attorney? There were three reasons.
- First, I didn't want to spend the $10,000-75,000 on a lawyer.
- Second, I thought it would be an incredible learning opportunity (which it was).
- Third, I wanted to see if a regular small-time inventor (me) would be able to figure out the patent arcana without a lawyer.
It took me about a month to write my application. Bill Seidel recommended that I read David Pressman's book, Patent It Yourself, which was an enormous help. My friend David Gildea (a registered Patent Agent and a fellow Stanford Masters swimmer) gave me some very useful advice — especially regarding "chaining claims." My CAD designer, Jason Hilbourne, also had some valuable pointers.
I'll be candid and say that dealing with the USPTO was "quite challenging." There were a lot of hoops to go through and hurdles to jump. I received several rejections, and had to write lengthy appeals. I had a number of phone conversations with my examiner and his supervisor.
There were times I considered giving up on the whole process. But I continued to press on. David Gildea gave me some good advice on "prior art and obviousness." Finally, in late May, I received word that my design was patentable and would be approved in July.
I learned a lot from the whole experience, including:
- Keep good records and make copies of them (things sometimes go missing at the USPTO);
- A regular, normal individual willing to put in the time and effort can get a patent; and,
- Be persistent, be persistent, be persistent.
Congratulations, Roger! The hard work pays off ... and this demonstrates that having a good idea is just the beginning!
Posted by: Gavin Heaton | 26 July 2007 at 04:38 PM
That is outstanding, Roger! Not many folks hold patents, and even fewer have written their own "patentese". Well done.
Posted by: Jason Hilbourne | 26 July 2007 at 04:46 PM
Roger,
I believe in determination. As long as the intention is good, time does not matter... because you have the best reason why.
Congratulations this is a beautiful victory!
Posted by: mindblob | 26 July 2007 at 04:58 PM
"Third, I wanted to see if a regular small-time inventor (me) would be able to figure out the patent arcana without a lawyer."
Roger - You are less "regular" than "extraordinary." Not everyone could have worked through that maze... I'm trying to figure out the patent office, and quite frankly I cannot discern a consistent principle on which they base their decisions.
Kudos to you.
Posted by: Cam Beck | 26 July 2007 at 07:28 PM
Gavin and Luc: Thanks for the kind wishes. It was an interesting process. It was an eye-opening process to go through.
Jason: Thanks. Good luck with your patent process.
Cam: "Not everyone could have worked through that maze." I'll tell you some interesting stories some time!
Posted by: Roger von Oech | 26 July 2007 at 08:42 PM
Wow Roger, congratulations. I wouldn't have been able to pull off something like that. Wonderful news.
Posted by: David Armano | 26 July 2007 at 09:02 PM
Congratulations! I think it's fantastic that you did it without a patent attorney.
David.
Posted by: David Warner | 26 July 2007 at 09:16 PM
Congratulations! Glad your patent patience paid off.
Posted by: Mark McGuinness | 26 July 2007 at 11:45 PM
Congratulations!!!!
Three fold kudos - first on getting patent, second on doing it yourself, and third on getting it granted in remarkable time - 32 months from file to issue is REALLY short. I think it has a lot to do with the high novelty and that isn't anything else similar to the Ball of Whacks out there.
Posted by: Karl | 27 July 2007 at 05:03 AM
Roger, congratulations! Don't take this the wrong way, it's meant as a complement: You remind me of my dog! :-D
Posted by: Robert Hruzek | 27 July 2007 at 05:31 AM
Congratulations Roger! An amazing accomplishment!
Posted by: Paula Palmer | 27 July 2007 at 07:04 AM
Roger,
Congratulations both on the patent and on building a network of friends that included the ones who helped you on the patent.
John
Posted by: Shakespeare's Fool | 27 July 2007 at 11:33 AM
Talk about tenacity! Congrats on the patent - these look wonderful.
Posted by: Kris Bordessa | 28 July 2007 at 05:35 PM
Imagine if you had to go through the process in Italy! On the other hand -- it took two days (and before Christmas) to renew my Italian passport and I am now going on 12+ weeks for my US passport. Guess I should have learned a lot more about the mess they're in before I sent my only precious traveling card for renewal, huh?
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | 29 July 2007 at 04:26 PM
Many congratulations! What's the old saying, "If it was easy, everybody would be doing it." It makes the victory so much more worth winning. You've been an inspiration for me for many years. Keep stepping out!
Posted by: Dianna | 02 August 2007 at 07:00 AM
congrats, but just for your readers info, I personally consider the patent office and "patents" to be a fraud and waste of time. YOu can make and market something without a patent, and (especially the big boys) can "steal" a patent just by simply altering a small aspect of a prior patent. There's little you can do, and large companies have teams of people who comb patents looking for stuff they can steal - I mean, modify. Don't waste your time. Find someone you can trust and just make it and sell it.
Posted by: joe ullman | 22 October 2007 at 02:09 AM
How much did it cost and how much time did you put into it?
Thanks.
Posted by: Millan | 02 March 2008 at 08:01 PM
The advice to be persistent is an excellent advice.
Question: Did the 32 months include the Provisional date of filing or did it start with date of the Full-blown application?
I filed my Provisional in December,2005 and the Full-blown application in December 0f 2005. It was published in May this year. The USPTO has made numerous errors so far indicating that they do not have a quality check system in place. No rejection or office action yet. I will be extremely persistent.
P.S USPTO are hiring patent examiners everyday.
Posted by: Terry Moore | 02 August 2008 at 12:26 AM
Congrats! I also want to do a patent.
Question: Could you alter your claims based on descriptions? Does USPTO complaint about changing claims just because it's different than before?
I'd really glad if you teach me some tricks, I'm encouraged to follow your steps.
Posted by: Manu Kovic | 04 September 2008 at 03:20 PM
what do you think of companies that offer to develop your idea for sales, licensing, developlment, marketing, etc.? It seems like the companies like to have about $10,000 before they will start on your project. My gut on this is that it is wasted money and that a patentable idea and sellable idea should be able to be sold directly to the manufacturer and or sales outlet, but I want the opinion of someone who has done this before. thanks Jeff Wolfe
Posted by: Jeff Wolfe | 06 July 2010 at 09:31 AM