It's time again for some inspiration from Heraclitus, the world's first creativity teacher (he lived around 500 BC). Today's insight is: “I searched into myself.”
Heraclitus felt that consulting our own knowledge and intuition is a wonderful way to gain insight. Unfortunately, some of us never learned this lesson. Much of our educational system is an elaborate game of "guess what the teacher is thinking," and we come to believe that the best ideas are in someone else's head rather than our own. Heraclitus reminds us that there are good ideas within ourselves if we are willing to dig deeply enough.
I believe there's a creative strategy in Heraclitus' insight, and it is:
We can emulate Heraclitus by searching for own creative tendencies. Here are six of mine:
1. I get my ideas either when I'm under a lot of pressure — "the ultimate inspiration is the deadline" — or when I'm away from the problem altogether. I rarely get them when I'm doing routine tasks that require some attention.
2. If I'm mentally blocked in trying to solve a problem, it's usually because I'm in love with a particular idea — so much so that it prevents me from looking for alternatives. Only when I force myself to become detached from it and "kiss it goodbye" do I find new answers. Letting go of a previously cherished idea can be one of life's great pleasures.
3. I try to pay attention to small things: how much frowning takes place in beer commercials, what sorts of patterns dead leaves make around a storm drain, and so on. I do this partly because I've trained myself to do it, but also because I've been forced to. I'm left-handed, but the world is designed for right-handed people — something most "righties" don't even think about. I'm constantly being made conscious of how things are put together. For example, telephone booths are designed to make right-handed people feel comfortable and at ease, but lefties can feel clumsy using them.
4. My own ego can get in the way of discovering new things. However, if I allow myself to lower my resistance to those ideas that I typically dismiss as irrelevant or unattractive, I find that they can become doorways to solutions I've been overlooking.
5. I don't know what I don't know. I've got a big blind spot, and the only way to get access to what's lurking out there is to put myself in a humble, receptive frame of mind (not always easy to do) and ask others to point out what I'm not seeing.
6. Rejection of my work in the early phases of the creative process doesn't bother me. I'm not afraid of taking one of my less than stellar ideas and asking complete strangers what they think of it. I find their responses frank and refreshing.
Questions: What's your creative style? What are your strengths and weaknesses?
Roger,
This is interesting in that I don't use a process. I do, however, spend time everyday centering myself and looking/listening to my heart and my inner voice.
My ideas come:
1. Any time except when I am not engaged with trying to find an idea.
2. When I'm sleeping.
3. When I am doing physical work.
4. When I am writing.
5. Most often, when I am reading other's work, such as now, for example.
Posted by: Lewis Green | 29 November 2007 at 08:21 AM
i like the phrase: "i searched into myself".
it depends what the creative process is. often it just happens (some people who know me may now be rolling their eyes, saying, TOO often :)
when it is a more conscious process, i maybe not search but LISTEN into myself. then it often seems that what comes up is beyond myself. i need to hold still for that. those nebulous concepts/ideas/words from that other place don't get through if there's too much noise.
then sometimes i also search outside of myself. what are others doing? and as i survey the land, all of a sudden it clicks, and the right angle/idea shows up.
my weaknesses? i like to chase too many butterflies. they're all so pretty! i start a lot of projects and don't finish that many.
but as i get older i wonder more and more whether that is really a weakness. maybe a whole bunch need to get started in order for a few to be finished.
Posted by: isabella mori | 29 November 2007 at 08:54 AM
This post couldn't have come at a better time. I recently finished a creative project and have been thinking about my creative process and how I generated my ideas.
So far, I've figured out that my style is about chaos transforming into clarity through these functions: taking walks, meditating, middle of the night musings.
PS. Roger, I'm an OSU alum too. Go Buckeyes!
Posted by: Melanie | 29 November 2007 at 09:22 AM
Lewis: Sounds like you get your ideas "near the edges," that is, when you're away from the problem altogether, or when you consciously trying to get ideas, e.g., writing.
Posted by: Roger von Oech | 29 November 2007 at 05:34 PM
Isabella: "My weaknesses? I like to chase too many butterflies. They're all so pretty! I start a lot of projects and don't finish that many." Good self-awareness.
" . . . but as i get older i wonder more and more whether that is really a weakness. maybe a whole bunch need to get started in order for a few to be finished." Or, what do you think if you'd kill your babies sooner? Would you be able to finish more and sooner?
Melanie: I hope you're able to give yourself time to find that clarity. BTW: I took a lotta joy in another Buckeye win over Michigan! You too, I'm sure!
Posted by: Roger von Oech | 29 November 2007 at 07:15 PM
i get my best ideas
--under deadline pressure
or
--building marble mazes with my children!
if i had endless resources, i would keep buying the haba marble maze pieces [and design a few of my own!]...learn a lot about flow, and always reveal my strengths and limitations...i tend to build castles in the air and this puts me at a production level that's more concrete.
i have become a TOTAL toy junkie. i even adapted a creative thinking exercise to my freshman comp classes-- we play with toys and figure out how to improve/adapt/streamline them, and then try to make the leap to larger problems/solutions. still working out the kinks in this lesson plan, but every time we do it i get more ideas on how to improve the lesson and make it more useful. for starters, i'd like to think it's useful b/c my students vaguely remember the exercise down the line; few courses require them to play with toys!
gotta go build a marble maze!
Posted by: shelbey | 30 November 2007 at 06:34 AM
Roger,
Michael Bierut (of Pentagram) put up a great article about his creative 'process'. He writes:
"The other day I was looking at a proposal for a project I finished a few months ago. The result, by my measure and by the client's, was successful. But guess what? The process I so reassuringly put forward at the outset had almost nothing to do with the way the project actually went. What would happen, I wonder, if I actually told the truth about what happens in a design process?"
For his 'honest' description, see: http://www.designobserver.com/archives/017485.html
It's well worth a read for all of us who (are forced to) think that a creative process can be explained away in phases, steps, etc.
Posted by: Otto Driessen | 30 November 2007 at 08:55 AM
Shelbey: Sounds like you get your ideas "at the edges" as well. Yes, indeed, toys are fun to play with.
Otto: Thanks for the link to Michael Bierut post. Interesting observations.
Posted by: Roger von Oech | 30 November 2007 at 11:04 AM
I am so glad that I have found this site. I admire your work and books and will enjoy this contact. My students were stimulated to new thinking habits using your materials.
Posted by: Sue Cooper | 27 August 2008 at 04:58 PM